Awesome
Thursday, September 30, 2004
According to an article published in the UK and Yahoo, women sprinters will be faster than men at the 2156 Olympic games. "If projections by scientists at Oxford University are correct, women will close the gender gap by clocking 8.079 seconds in the 100 metres, ahead of the best male time of 8.098 seconds. The current world record stands at 9.78 seconds". Look closely at the the fourth word of that sentence. Doesn't that word seem a bit out of place? This article sounds a lot like the hypothesis of a little experiment I did with a ruler in third grade. I marked how much I had grown the previous few years, and then I took my ruler and drew a line through the points on my graph. I predicted that by age 20 I would be 8 feet tall. I ended up 5 foot 10.
This brings us to my question. Am I reading this wrong or did some guy at Oxford pass himself off as scientist by ripping off the scientific methods of a 9 year old in third grade? Using the same type of logic, by the year 2456, men will be running the 100 meters in under one second (.2 seconds) and women will be running it in less than one tenth of a second (.003 seconds).
This leads us to my last question. What kind of ruler do you think this Oxford man used?
here's the link: Women will one day outsprint men





